
No matter where you come down on debates of massive corporate globalization, wealth inequality, environmental issues, and armed conflict, it's always nice to have a well informed opinion. Or at least listen to someone else's opinion. I recently watched some movies and recommend them for public consumption (consume damn you, consume!).
The first one, "
The Fourth World War", features live footage shot by cameramen (over 100 of them) documenting civil disturbances and war. Realistic video, chronicling the violence and instability around the world, paint a raw and sometimes surreal picture that the US media, in particular, often ignore. If you really stop and think, it's such a great disservice the media does for us, and it's just sad that American media has to follow the trends/schemes of other countries -misinformation, omittance of information, spin of information etc. It reminds of an interview I saw with a top executive from
ABC (I think it was Iger, who was President of
ABC at the time). He talked about how he had spent some years in London and recognized how the news was noticably different from that of in the States, specifically news relating to foreign affairs. Yada, yada, yada he basically went on to say that as President of
ABC it was profits that motivated which stories were covered, and not necessarily about how "newsworthy" the story was. Duh, right? I know it's not a real big secret, I just thought it was interesting coming straight from the horse's mouth. The media people are smart, they know exactly what they're feeding us, and what they are holding back. Funny thing is, I think there is a thirst for
real knowledge about places far away, and unfortunately, there is currently no way of really obtaining it short of actually hoping on a plane.
The injustice served to many (most?) is all too familiar for those living in developing countries, and just because the voices go largely unheard and unnoticed in some parts of the world who chose to turn a blind eye, it does not follow that we should remain ignorant and unaware. Scenes of economic crisises from Argentina to South Korea, violent protests of the GTO, NAFTA, WTO, etc. from Genoa to Seattle, and popular resistance movements like the Zapatistas in Mexico and the blacks in South Africa, created a collage of growing restistance movements. Having studied economics back in college, I can't claim to support all the activists or their messages, however the images of people breaking into a bank in Buenos Aires and smashing ATM machines are quite riveting (as are riot police getting pelleted with moltov cocktails). Some other scenes were gory and intense, including a young palestinian girl who was killed, and the ensuing emotional outpouring by her family. Plus, as one reviewer at
IMDB said, it's nice to know where your tax paying cents are going.
The second movie,
The Corporation, is another attempt to analyze current dilemmas with the modern day Corporation. It's hard to be vindictive of corporations without being hypocritical, especially since almost every facet of our lives revolves around them. This movie does do a good job of separating the people from the actual entity (although both are considered equal under US law). The best part was an analogy told by Ray Anderson about resource sustainability and man's first attempts to fly. In the analogy, he talks about how man's first attempts of flying..gliding off of a cliff and basically flapping his wings until he crashed, was similiar to the direction of the modern corporation's future course into the unknown, and the havoc being caused to Earth's resources. Here the cliff used to glide off of represented the limited amount of resources in the world, presumed to be limitless by many of today's corporations, and the crude aircraft represented the corporation, which would never really fly, because its designs were fundamentally flawed. How long it would take the plane to "run out" of cliff before it crashed was a matter of time and in the case of resources..perception. He called those who could see the reality of how fast the ground was actually coming were "today's visonaries". I've always been a believer in necessity fueling invention, and it's going to be interesting to see what happens in the decades to come.
How wasteful, backward, and inefficient we will surely look to future generations. On that note, time to go fill my non smog-compliant Volvo with rich fossil fuels! Gas is just starting to climax the $3.00/Gallon in the Los Angeles area! Exciting!